<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Programming Languages Aren&#8217;t</title>
	<link>http://blog.bigzaphod.org/2008/09/29/programming-languages-arent/</link>
	<description>Huh?</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 23:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: x</title>
		<link>http://blog.bigzaphod.org/2008/09/29/programming-languages-arent/#comment-4980</link>
		<dc:creator>x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 10:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.bigzaphod.org/2008/09/29/programming-languages-arent/#comment-4980</guid>
		<description>XML FTW!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>XML FTW!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://blog.bigzaphod.org/2008/09/29/programming-languages-arent/#comment-4978</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.bigzaphod.org/2008/09/29/programming-languages-arent/#comment-4978</guid>
		<description>@g: I'm not entirely sure if I agree that the composition is drastically different when talking about different topics.  Maybe it is and I just don't notice it because I'm too used to it.  Have an example that's easy to spot?

...

After thinking some more.. I kind of understand what I think you're saying, but I'd call that more of a presentation difference due to the different elements of the message that are being highlighted.  Hmm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@g: I&#8217;m not entirely sure if I agree that the composition is drastically different when talking about different topics.  Maybe it is and I just don&#8217;t notice it because I&#8217;m too used to it.  Have an example that&#8217;s easy to spot?</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>After thinking some more.. I kind of understand what I think you&#8217;re saying, but I&#8217;d call that more of a presentation difference due to the different elements of the message that are being highlighted.  Hmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g</title>
		<link>http://blog.bigzaphod.org/2008/09/29/programming-languages-arent/#comment-4977</link>
		<dc:creator>g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.bigzaphod.org/2008/09/29/programming-languages-arent/#comment-4977</guid>
		<description>Try expanding the English language side of your analogy. Yes, the sentence-level grammar is the same for different fields of study, but the higher-level structure and convention is not. The composition of a sports article in the newspaper is unlike the composition of a physics research report. Combining the two in any reasonable way would be difficult, just like combining your different C libraries is hard even they both use the same "sentence-level" grammar for statements and loops and procedure calls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try expanding the English language side of your analogy. Yes, the sentence-level grammar is the same for different fields of study, but the higher-level structure and convention is not. The composition of a sports article in the newspaper is unlike the composition of a physics research report. Combining the two in any reasonable way would be difficult, just like combining your different C libraries is hard even they both use the same &#8220;sentence-level&#8221; grammar for statements and loops and procedure calls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

